Mission format
Architecture review
Have an architecture decision reviewed before it becomes irreversible.
When this mission makes sense
-
01
Still-contested platform or topology choice
-
02
Migration prepared without acceptance criteria
-
03
Architecture debt now threatening delivery
Decisions it must unlock
- Which options are still truly open?
- Which dependencies make a choice hard to reverse?
- Which criteria validate or invalidate the target architecture?
What is observed
- Analysis of options and constraints
- Mapping of critical dependencies
- Documented trade-off recommendation
What is produced
- Decision log
- Dependency map
- Target architecture criteria
What we need from you
- Diagrams and ADRs
- Business and regulatory constraints
- Operations context
How it starts
-
1.
Review of existing artefacts
-
2.
Targeted interviews
-
3.
Risk and alternative review
-
4.
Written restitution
Who should join
- CTO
- Architects
- Security lead
- Platform lead
Duration : Bounded review; extension only if new options appear.
Mode : Remote or on-site depending on artefact sensitivity.
Geographic scope : France · Europe · Middle East · Africa
Explicit limits
- Full implementation of the target architecture
- Replacement of a product team
- Formal certification without evidence
What documents the reasoning
- Architecture publications
- Public review write-ups
Related expertise areas
Have an architecture decision reviewed
Describe the decision you need to make. First reading is done by leadership or a responsible expert.