Welcome! Simplifi'ED is now Omnivya. We're excited to announce that Simplifi'ED has evolved into Omnivya! This transformation reflects our commitment to serving you even better, with expanded expertise in Cloud Native, Kubernetes, GreenOps, FinOps, and DevSecOps. Our new brand embodies innovation, sustainability, and security so you can accelerate your digital journey with confidence. Thank you for trusting us as your technology partner! Learn more

Area of expertise

Kubernetes

Kubernetes rarely becomes difficult because the cluster lacks features. It becomes difficult when nobody can say which responsibilities belong to the platform, product teams, and operations.

Operational definition

Kubernetes is an orchestration foundation whose value depends on a clear operating model: lifecycle, isolation, policies, observability, recovery, and team-facing interfaces.

Problems actually encountered

  • 01

    Inconsistent clusters without lifecycle policy

  • 02

    Incidents passed between platform and product teams

  • 03

    Upgrades delayed until they become risky

  • 04

    Security controls present but bypassed or misunderstood

Decisions involved

  • Define the platform product and its service levels
  • Choose isolation, multi-tenancy, and trust boundaries
  • Balance managed distribution, autonomy, and required skills

Common errors

  • Treating Kubernetes as a transparent layer
  • Adding operators and extensions without owners
  • Measuring cluster health but not user experience

Signals that external expertise becomes useful

  • Upgrades cause prolonged freezes
  • Policy exceptions keep increasing
  • The platform slows the delivery it was meant to support

Omnivya method

  1. 1.

    Observe usage, incidents, and change flows

  2. 2.

    Map ownership and critical dependencies

  3. 3.

    Test upgrades, restoration, and policy enforcement

  4. 4.

    Prioritise corrections by operational risk

Possible deliverables

  • Operating-model diagnosis
  • Platform-product responsibility map
  • Upgrade and risk-reduction path

Evidence of reasoning

  • Repeatable upgrade and restore tests
  • Documented ownership and escalation
  • Configuration gaps tied to concrete risks

Browse public work

Explicit limits

  • No Kubernetes recommendation when orchestration is unjustified
  • No taking over on-call duties from teams
  • No tooling added before ownership gaps are identified

Related mission formats

Frequently asked questions

Do you audit one cluster or the whole platform?
Scope can be one cluster, but analysis covers the dependencies and ownership required to explain how it actually operates.
Must every cluster be standardised?
Not necessarily. Differences must be justified, owned, and compatible with the expected lifecycle.
Do you assist during incidents?
Yes, to clarify a complex incident and its decisions, not to become the permanent operations team.

Examine a Kubernetes risk

If this tension is yours, let’s frame the decision before widening the scope.

Examine a Kubernetes risk